本篇论文目录导航:
【题目】高校教代会教师民主参与问题探究
【第一章】
程序正义下教师参与教代会制度研究绪论
【第二章】
程序正义的基本内涵
【第三章】
大学教代会教师参与的内容
【第四章】
教职工代表大会教师参与问题分析
【第五章】
基于程序正义的教代会教师参与体制优化
【结论/参考文献】
教代会教师参与的程序正义研究结论与参考文献
摘 要
教职工代表大会制度是我国大学民主管理体制的重要组成部分,也是大学教师参与大学民主管理与监督的基本形式。教育法律法规的颁布施行进一步明确了教职工代表大会制度作用和地位,是完善推进教职工代表大会制度及运行的重要举措。教代会制度是现代大学治理的重要内容,它是全心全意依靠教职工办学的重要保证。当前,大学教代会制度正在健全完善中,制度运行也不断走向成熟,但在实践过程中,教师作为参与学校民主管理的主体,有效参与问题却长期普遍存在。
笔者以大学教代会制度的教师参与为研究对象,运用观察法及访谈法,通过观察案例大学的制度实践,及对教师参与教代会的现状进行调查,对目前大学教代会教师民主参与存在的问题进行反思,并从程序正义视角对教代会教师参与制度进行完善。本研究对相关概念进行了界定,梳理了程序正义理论,立足于程序正义理论和大学内部治理理论,通过案例分析,利用系统的观点对大学教代会教师参与问题进行分析。出现的问题主要表现在三个方面:教师代表参与的积极性不足;教师参与条件不足,信息掌握不对等;教师参与机会缺失,参与领域偏少。由此提出从程序正义角度,完善大学教代会教师参与制度,具体思路包括,规范大学教代会制度内容,实现教师参与内容的深度与广度;完善大学教代会制度形式,保障教师参与机会与条件。大学的民主文化本质决定着大学民主制度,民主本身也是文化。因此,从民主制度文化入手,提出培育教师对教代会制度信仰、管理者对教代会制度敬畏,从本质上提高大学教师的民主意识,从而保障教师履行民主管理、民主监督的主体地位,推动大学民主治校及法治治校。
关键词:程序正义;大学;教职工代表大会;教师参与
Abstract
The staff delegates congress system is an important part of the democraticmanagement system in Chinese colleges and universities, and also a basic form ofstaff participating in the democratic management and supervision. The related lawspromulgation is not only the further affirmation to the function and status of the staffdelegates congress system, but also is an important measure to improve and perfectthe staff delegates congress system and operation. The staff delegates congress systemis an important content of the modern university governance. It is also an importantassurance which depends on staffs to run a school wholeheartedly. In recent, theuniversity staff delegates congress system is perfecting, and the operation of thesystem is also constantly to become mature. But during the operation of the staffdelegates congress system, the staffs as the subject participating in the schooldemocratic management, the problem of staffs' effective participation existscommonly for a long time.
I take the staffs' participation of the university staff delegates congress system asthe research object, using the observation method and interview method to observethe system operation of the case university. At the same time, the presentsituation of staffs' participation in the staff delegates congress is investigated. Thepurpose is to reflect on the problem of staffs' democratic participation of theuniversity staff delegates congress and to improve the staffs' participation system ofthe staff delegates congress from the perspective of the procedural justice. Somerelevant concepts are defined, and the theory of procedural justice is cleared up in thisresearch. Based on the theories of procedural justice and university internalgovernance, the system point is used to analyze the problems of the staffs'participation through the analysis of cases. The problems are mainly in three aspects:the insufficient of representatives' participating initiative;the insufficient of staffs'participating conditions, and non-equivalence in the extent of mastering information;the deficiency of staffs' participation opportunity and the deviation of field toparticipate. Consequently, it is necessary to improve the staffs' participation system ofthe university staff delegates congress. The specific ideas includes , normalizing thecontent of the university staff delegates congress system to realize the depth andbreadth of the staffs' participation; improving the form of the university staff delegates congress system to guarantee the opportunities and conditions of the staffs'participation. The essence of the university democratic culture determines theuniversity democratic system. In fact, democracy is also a kind of culture. Therefore,from the culture of democracy system, cultivating staffs' belief in the university staffdelegates congress system, and the managers' awe to the university staff delegatescongress system are raised. The university staffs' democratic awareness will beimproved in essence, so as to assure the staffs' dominant roles to perform democraticmanagement and democratic supervision, and then to promote the democraticgovernance of universities and to manage the universities by law.
Key words: Procedural Justice;University;the Staff Delegates CongressSystem;Staff Participation
目 录
摘 要
Abstract
目 录
1 绪论
1.1 研究背景
1.2 研究意义
1.2.1理论意义
1.2.2实践意义
1.3 概念界定
1.3.1大学民主性
1.3.2大学民主管理
1.3.3大学民主管理组织形式:教代会制度
1.3.4大学教代会教师参与
1.4 文献综述
1.4.1国外研究现状
1.4.2.国内研究现状
1.5 研究方法和创新之处
1.5.1研究方法
1.5.2研究的创新之处
2 程序正义的基本内涵
2.1 程序正义
2.2 程序正义与实体正义
2.3 制度层面的程序正义内容
3 大学教代会教师参与的内容
3.1 大学教代会程序权利
3.2 大学教代会教师参与内涵
4 大学教代会教师参与问题分析
4.1 调查的基本情况
4.1.1调查研究假设和研究程序
4.1.2样本描述及依据的选择
4.1.3访谈对象的选择
4.1.4调查方法
4.2 调查结果分析
4.2.1教师代表参与的积极性不足
4.2.2教师参与条件不足,信息掌握不对等
4.2.3教师参与机会缺失,参与领域偏少
5 基于程序正义的大学教代会教师参与制度优化
5.1 大学教代会制度程序价值特征
5.2 规范大学教代会制度内容,实现教师参与内容的深度与广度
5.2.1.从大学教代会程序规则制定层面
5.2.2从学校内部的体系化制度层面
5.2.3从立法制度与制度落实方面
5.3 完善大学教代会制度形式,保障教师参与机会与条件
5.3.1扩大教代会教师参与机会
5.3.2.各个专门工作委员会的设立
5.3.3.健全二级教代会组织建设
5.4 培育大学教代会教师参与的民主制度文化
5.4.1培育教师对教代会制度的信仰
5.4.2培育管理者对教代会制度敬畏
结 论
参考文献
致 谢