比较法视域内的法典化问题研究 中英文摘要

　　摘 要

　　法律法典化问题近年来一直是我国法律生活中比较热门的话题。许多研究部门法问题的学者特别是研究民法和行政法问题的学者都热切地关注着这一问题。而理论法学界对法律法典化问题的反应似乎不是特别强烈，从比较法的角度对法典化问题进行系统化研究的成果也不多见。本文字数共 3 万多字，共分为五章，本论文依照下述思路划分为以下几章：

　　第一章是从是法典化的基本概论，从“法典”和“法典化”的基本概念入手，探究法典化的优势，同时对于法典化的局限性进行阐述，以此引起思考法典化的重要性进行讨论和论述。

　　第二章论述近当代大陆法系的法典化理论及其实践活动，从 18、19 世纪欧洲的法典化运动阐述，通过对历史上第一次法典化——蒂堡和萨维尼的论战阐明是否需要法典化。在进行法典化实践的阐述中，着重从两个国家的民法典编纂实践叙述，分别是《法国民法典》编纂和《德国民法典》的编纂以及它对现代法典传统的巩固和发展。

　　第三章论述的是近当代英美法系的典型国家法典化的理论及其实践，从英国早起的法律改革开始阐述，说明当时在英国法典化编纂活动遭受到的反对和阻挠。在边沁时代，他积极主张法典化的形式，在 1802 年边沁出版了《完整法典概述》，反映了当时的时代精神。当代的英国断断续续的有人向议会提出有关法典编纂的议案，但是无一例外的都被撤回。英国的本土反对法典化的力量仍旧很强大，决定了英国的法典化道路上的每一点进步都是一个漫长的过程。

　　第四章是文章的写作主旨，主要阐述中国法典化的必然性，中国法典化的道路选择，从中国选择法典化的历史渊源进行阐述。其中着重阐述中国如何走向法典化道路——即中国法典化道路的路径，分别从中国法典化的理性主义和实用主义相结合，完善法律体系等方面进行阐述。

　　第五章是立足于当下中国的现实，进一步对于中国法典的编纂进行大胆的建议，起到画龙点睛的作用，最后阐述中国法典化道路的意义。

　　关键词：法典；法典编纂；法典化

　　Abstract

　　Under the reform of the Chinese socialist legal system reform make snap, codificationquestion became hot topic of many scholars, this paper based on the perspective ofComparative Law Study on the problems of the details on the code. More than40,000words of full text, are made up of five chapters altogether. The main con tent ofevery chapter is summarized as follows:

　　The first chapter is an introduction to the basic codification, starting from the basicconcept of "law" and "law", explore the codification of the advantages, at the same timelimitation for codification is expounded, the paper discussed the importance andconsideration of codification.

　　The second chapter discusses the contemporary civil law codification of theory andpractice, elaborated from the code 18, Europe in the nineteenth Century campaign, the firsttime in the history of the codification -- thibaut and Savigny debate to clarify whethercodification. In the code of practice is introduced, mainly from the two countries in thecompilation of the civil code of practice are described, the compilation of "French CivilCode" and "German civil code compilation" and its modern traditional codificationconsolidation and development.

　　The third chapter discusses the theory of the state is typical of codification ofcontemporary Anglo-American law system and its practice, from the legal reform of theBritish early set, indicating that in the British code compiling activity suffer from theopposition and obstruction. In the age of Bentham, he advocated the form of codification,in 1802 Bentham published "the complete code Overview", reflects the spirit of the times.

　　The contemporary British and some relevant codification bill to parliament, but all werewithdrawn. The British home against codification strength is still strong, determines theprogress of each point of the codification of the road in England is a lengthy process.

　　The fourth chapter is the writing purpose, mainly expounds the necessity ofcodification of China, Chinese codification road choice, carries on the elaboration fromChinese history of codification of choice. Which focuses on how China toward codificationroad -- path of codification of Chinese road, respectively from the Chinese codification ofrationalism and pragmatism combination, improve the legal system and so on.

　　The fifth chapter is based on the current reality in China, further to the compilation ofChinese civil law is bold proposal, play a role in the finishing touch, the last Chinesecodification path illustrates the significance of.

　　Key words: Code；Codification of code；Codification
返回硕士论文目录查看全文    下一章：引言