论文摘要:考试是人类特有的实践活动,是随着社会发展中脑力劳动与体力劳动的分工以及选拨领导者、管理人员以及各种专业技能人才而产生。现代社会中考试的运用极为广泛,己成为世界各国的普遍现象。考试制度的规范与否,对于一个国家发展,社会的有序运行极为重要,本文即立足于这一视角进行的研究。全文除引论外,共分五章。
在“引论”部分:介绍了本文的研究对象、研究缘由、研究意义、研究成果综述以及本文的研究方法,尤其是就本文的研究缘由重点作了说明,并指出了当前我国在考试的设置以及组织实施方面基本上做到了有法可依,但从法治原则的视角以及具体实施过程中来看,无论是考试的设置还是组织实施过程中都还存在着诸多问题。
在"第一章国家考试设置的法律控制”部分:首先,介绍了考试及其分类;其次,介绍了我国现行国家考试的形态及法律属性,指出当前国家考试的形态主要由国家教育考试、国家资格考试、国家工作人员录用考试、国家水平考试,并分别从行政计划、行政确认等角度对这四种国家考试的形态进行了法律分析;第三,重点论述了设置国家考试实质上是一种国家立法活动以及就当前国家考试设置的合法性进行了分析;最后,从国家考试设置中的法律保留、国家考试的分级设置以及国家考试设置的程序等方面提出了针对国家考试设置进行法律规制的具体方案。
在“第二章国家考试组织实施的法治化”部分:首先,介绍了国家考试组织实施的主体;其次,就国家考试在组织实施方面存在的问题进行了规范分析,指出存在的问题主要体现在部分国家考试的具体实施机构不明确以及部分国家资格考试的实施机构不适格等方面;再次,本部分还研究了国家考试组织实施主体所具有的职权以及组织实施国家考试应具备的基本程序;最后,就台湾地区国家考试组织实施模式、芙国模式以及英国、俄罗斯等国家的国家考试模式进行了简要的分析。
在“第三章国家考试参与人的权利义务”部分:首先分析了当前国家考试活动中涉及到法律关系主体,主要包括了国家考试机关、应考人员以及其他参与人员;其次,分别分析了国家考试准备阶段各方主体的权利义务、国家考试进行阶段各方主体的权利义务、考试结果评定阶段各方主体的权利义务。
在“第四章国家考试秩序的法律保障”部分:首先,从考试违法行为的构成要件、考试违法行为的类型两个方面论述了危害国家考试秩序的行为;其次,从危害国家考试秩序的法律责任的构成、法律责任形式、不同主体危害国家考试法律责任等几个方面论述了危害国家考试秩序的法律责任;第三,从完善刑事责任追究程序、完善行政责任追究程序方面论述了危害国家考试秩序的法律责任的追究;最后,就现行国家考试领域中的行政强制措施进行了规范及适法性分析。
在“第五章国家考试法律规制的路径”部分:首先,指出了国家考试法治化的根本途径就是制定国家考试法,并明确指出该法的立法目的就是为了规范考试的设置与实施,保护考生的合法权益,保障考试安全,维护考试的公平与科学,维护公共利益以及促进法制统一;其次,从基本概念与原则、基本程序、授权条款、救济程序等方面就国家考试法的基本内容进行论述;最后,论述了国家考试法在国家考试法律体系中的地位,指出国家考试法是国家考试的基本法。
关键词:国家考试 法律调控 研究
Abstract :As one of a unique human activity, examination emerges along with the socialdevelopment and the division of mental and manual labor, as well as the selection ofleaders, management personnel and various professional talents. Examination inmodern society is so widely used that it has become a very common phenomenon allover the world. Whether the examination system is standard or not is of extremeimportance for a country's development and social's orderly operation, thus, thispaper conducts the study on examination from this perspective. The whole article isdivided into five chapters besides the introduction part.
In introduction part, the paper introduces the objects, reasons, significances,results,and methods of the research, especially places emphasis on the reasons ofresearch, and points out that the current setting and implementation of examination inour country is basically developed on basis of law,however,judged from the rule oflaw principle and the concrete implementation process, there are still some problemsexisting either in examination design or implementation process.
In the first chapter of legal control of national examination setting, the paper firstdefines the examination and if s classification. Then, it presents the forms and legalnature of our current national examination, indicates that the forms of currentnational examination is mainly composed of four types as follows, the nationaleducation examination, the national qualification examination, the national staffrecruitment examination,and the national level examination, and the paper alsoanalyses the four types of national examinations in a legal way from the angles ofadministrative plan and administrative confirmation. Thirdly, it mainly explains thatthe setting of national examination virtually is a kind of national legislation, andanalyses the legitimacy of setting in current national examination. Finally, it putsforward the specific solutions for legal regulation of national examination setting fromthe perspective of law reservation, rating settings, and setting procedures, etc.
The second chapter is the legalization of organization and implementation ofnational examination. It first introduces the main body of organization andimplementation. In following, it makes a normative analysis of the existing problemson organization and implementation of national examination, points out that the mainexisting problems is that some specific implementing mechanisms are unclear, andsome implementing bodies are unqualified, etc. Then, it studies the authority ofimplementing body and the basic procedure of national examination organization. Thelast, the paper gives a brief analysis of the modes of national examination from othercountries and areas, such as Taiwan, the United States, the Great Britain, Russia, etc.
The third chapter is the rights and obligations of involved participants of nationalexamination. It first analyses the subjects of legal relation involved in examinationactivities,it mainly consists of national examination organs, examination candidates,and other personnel involved. Secondly, it sets forth the rights and obligations ofvarious subjects from different stages, that is the preparation stage,the on-going stage,and the results evaluation stage of examination.
In the forth chapter of legal protection of the order of national examination, itfirst discusses the violating behaviors on the order of national examination from theaspects of illegal liabilities' constitutive requirements and it's types. Secondly, itexplains the legal liabilities of violation of the order of national examination from thepoint view of legal liabilities' composition, forms, and different subjects. Thirdly, itdiscusses the investigation of legal liabilities in terms of procedure improvement ofadministrative and criminal liabilities investigation. At last, it makes a normative andlegal analysis of the compulsory administrative measures in current nationalexaminations field.
The fifth chapter is the path of legal regulations of national examination. Firstly,it points out that the fundamental approach to legalization of national examination isto legislate national examination law, and clearly defines that the legislative purpose isto regulate the setting and implementation of examination, protect legitimate rightsand interests of the candidates of examination, guarantee examination security,maintain a fairness and scientific atmosphere of examination,safeguard publicinterests, and promote the unification of legal system. Secondly, it explains somebasic content in terms of basic concepts and principles, basic procedures, the clausesof authorizing, and relief procedures, etc. Finally, it reviews the status of nationalexamination law on the national legal system,and indicates that the nationalexamination law is the basic law of national examination.
Key words: National Examination Legal Control Research
返回本篇博士论文目录查看全文 下一章:引论
引论考试是人类特有的实践活动,是随着社会发展中脑力劳动与体力劳动的分工以及选拨领导者、管理人员以及各种专业技能人」?而产生。现代社会中考试的运用极为广泛,已成为世界各国的普遍现象。如在教育系统中,为了录取新生组织的招生考试;为了...
改革开放以来的司法改革,经历了从审判方式改革到政治体制改革的发展变迁.这大致以2002年十六大将司法体制改革作为政治建设和政治体制改革的重要组成部分为过渡节点,体现出司法改革的逐步深化.在作为政治体制改革组成部分的司法体制改革和建设阶段,特别...
司法权来源于国家权力,是国家权力机关根据人民主权原则授予司法机关的一种专属权力.司法权有广义和狭义之分.狭义的司法权专指审判权,本文所讨论的司法权仅仅限定在狭义的范畴.论及司法权,必须界定其性质.司法权的性质可以从多角度来分析,诸如司法权的独立性...
第二节:国家考试准备阶段各方主体的权利义务法律上的权利义务,是指在特定的社会关系中,由法律规定的各方当事人可以做什么、应当做什么以及禁止做什么的内容。通过立法规定相关当事人的权利义务,离不开具体的社会关系。而正如前文所分析的,涉...
摘要十八届四中全会以来,法律职业共同体又一次成为了我国法律实务界和法学学术界讨论的热点话题。纵观西方法治国家法律职业共同体的形成和发展历史,法律职业共同体的发展与一国法治化进程有着密切的内在联系。法律职业的出现是法律职业共同体形成的前提...
结语综上所述,传统社会下的司法制度一直在不断地发展,之所以能在几千年的历史发展洪流中保持强大的生命力,就在于它具有稳定的内在价值体系和能承载其发展承接的本土资源。而且这种稳定的内在价值体系会使人们的内在司法观念以及具体参与的司法实践活动被...
随着社会主义法治的不断推进,加之十八届三中全会和四中全会对法治的推崇和倡导,法律职业共同体的相关问题愈发成为理论界和实务界关注的焦点。事实上,法律职业共同体在我国法治研究的进程中起步较晚且尚处于幼稚期。①而且其最初的着眼点是法律职业,并仅...
3我国法律职业共同体建设现状及问题法律职业共同体是随着经济、社会的历史性进步,而在法治成为社会主要治理方式时才逐步形成的。我国法律职业共同体的存在和发展,与我国的市场经济、民主政治、开放社会、现代历史以及多元文化等存在着千丝万缕的联系。在...
一、律师的社会责任社会责任这个概念在很早以前就开始使用,并非专属于律师职业,关于什么是律师的社会责任,有人做过调查,有人认为是律师作为法律人的人格责任;也有人认为是律师的法律责任;不同的人有不同的理解,首先应搞清楚社会责任的概念,才能在...
3.2部分国家灾害风险管理实践联合国国际减灾战略将灾害风险管理定义为一项系统工程,即运用行政决策、组织机构、操作技能和能力执行决策和战略,运用社会公众和社区的处置能力减小自然灾害和相关环境与技术灾害造成的影响。它由各种形式措施组成...