摘 要
行贿作为一种违背社会公平正义的不良现象，伴随着公权力产生，历史由来已久。虽然，我国反腐事业取得了较大进步，但是腐败现象却依然顽强存在，其形式更加多样，也更加隐蔽。究其原因，这1贿轻行贿的刑事政策有着极为重要的关系。针对刑法理论争议问题及司法实务困惑，出于有效打击行贿犯罪，维护社会公平正义的目的，围绕现行刑法的规定及相关司法解释，需对现行法律规范中行贿罪存在的相关问题进行研究探讨。目前，关于行贿罪“不正当利益”主观要件的研究，各相关理论均存在的不足，且通过论述“不正当利益”
与行贿罪的罪与非罪、既遂与未遂等之间的关系，“不正当利益”实现与否不是区分行贿罪构罪与犯罪停止形态的要素，同时，结合刑法理论依据与司法实务意义，行贿罪“不正当利益”主观要件应该予以废除，该罪主观方面也可更改为“为利用国家工作人员职权谋取利益”.此外，现行刑法关于行贿内容规定较窄，不利于打击和预防行贿行为，行贿内容应从财产性利益扩充至非财产性利益，该扩充基于刑法理论、实践经验、法律规范协调等方面具备可行性和必要性，并可以从修改法律条文、利用司法解释与完善量刑情节等方面进行实际操作。另外，由于刑事法律规范中关于行贿违法所得规定的定义不清、程序不明、审查不严等问题，造成司法实践的困境，需明确行贿违法所得范围，并从法律依据、界定范围、认定要求、追缴主体、监督救济等，规范行贿违法所得认定与追缴行为。
关键词： 行贿罪，不正当利益，行贿内容，行贿违法所得
ABSTRACT
Bribery as a violation of social justice negative phenomena, alongwith the public power generation, long history. Although China has madegreat progress in anti-corruption, but corruption is still stubborn presencein the form of a more diverse and more subtle. The reason for thisimportant aspect of China's current criminal law of bribery that causedcorruption regulations imperfect, light weight bribery bribery criminalpolicy has a very important relationship. Contentious issues for the theoryof criminal law and judicial practice confusion, for the purpose ofeffectively combating bribery crime, maintain social fairness and justice,about the provisions of the existing criminal law and relevant judicialinterpretations, the need for issues related to the existing legal normsbribery exists to explore research. Currently, research on bribery“illegitimate interests” subjective element, the relevant theories are thedeficiencies, and through relationships crime or, Accomplished andAttempted discussion between “illegitimate interests” and bribery, “illegitimate interests ”to achieve or not is not the distinction betweencrime and bribery crime stop shape structure elements, while combiningthe theoretical basis of criminal law and judicial practice meaning,bribery“ illegitimate interests ”subjective elements should be abolished,the subjective aspect of the crime may be changed to “for the use ofnational staff office for personal benefit.” In addition, the contents of theexisting criminal law provisions on bribery narrow, is not conducive tothe prevention of and fight against bribery, bribe content propertyinterests should be expanded to non-property interests, based on theexpansion of criminal law theory, practice and legal norms incoordination with other aspects of the feasibility and necessity, and maymodify the law, access to justice and improve the interpretation ofsentencing and other aspects of the actual operation. Further, since thedefinition of criminal legal norms bribery illegal income provisions isunclear, the program is unknown, lax review of other issues, resulting indifficulties in judicial practice, the need to define the scope of briberyillegal income, and from the legal basis for defining the scope,identification requirements, body recovered, monitoring relief, briberyillegal gains recognized norms and behavior recovered.
Key Words: Bribery,Illegitimate interests,Bribery content,Bribery illegal gains
目 录
摘 要
ABSTRACT
第一章 绪论
1.1 本研究课题的学术背景及理论与实际意义
1.2 国内外研究现状
1.3 本研究课题的来源及主要研究内容
第二章 “谋取不正当利益”的界定与存废辨析
2.1 我国法律对行贿罪“谋取不正当利益”历史演变
2.2 “不正当利益”的界定争说
2.2.1 “不正当利益”界定争议
2.2.2 我国立法关于“不正当利益”的解释及法律分析
2.3 “不正当利益”与 “罪”、“非罪”及犯罪停止形态的关系。
2.3.1 “不正当利益”与行贿罪的“罪”与“非罪”
2.3.2 “不正当利益”与行贿罪犯罪停止形态
2.4 “谋取不正当利益”要素存废辨析
2.4.1 “不正当利益” 取消的法理依据
2.4.2 “不正当利益” 取消的立法依据
2.4.3 “不正当利益” 取消的实践意义
第三章 行贿内容范围的解析及扩张
3.1 法律规范中行贿内容范围的规定
3.1.1 我国法律对行贿内容的规定
3.1.2 域外对于行贿内容的规定
3.2 行贿内容范围的争议
3.3 行贿内容范围的扩充及操作设想
3.3.1 行贿内容扩充的现实必要性
3.3.2 行贿内容扩充的现实可行性
3.3.3 行贿内容范围扩充设想
第四章 行贿违法所得的认定与追缴
4.1 违法所得的界定
4.2 行贿违法所得的认定及特征
4.2.1 行贿违法所得的认定
4.2.2 行贿违法所得的特征
4.3 行贿违法所得追缴的困境
4.3.1 行贿违法所得认定与追缴的法律依据不明确
4.3.2 行贿违法所得范围界定不清晰
4.3.3 行贿违法所得的认定数额不规范
4.3.4 行贿违法所得的认定证据不充分
4.3.5 行贿违法所得认定、追缴的监督、救济制度不完善
4.3.6 行贿违法所得追缴、处理的主体不规范
4.4 行贿违法所得认定、追缴的规范与完善
4.4.1 制定和完善有关行贿违法所得的法律规范
4.4.2 明确界定行贿违法所得的内涵与外延
4.4.3 规范行贿违法所得数额认定及证据要求
4.4.4 规范行贿违法所得追缴主体资格
4.4.5 加强行贿违法所得追缴工作的监督和救济
结 语
参考文献
致谢
