盗窃犯罪若干争议问题研究

　　硕士论文摘要

　　盗窃罪是一种常见的犯罪，不论是在理论界还是在司法实务界，一直备受关注。正因为其发案率高，盗窃对象不断扩大，盗窃手段不断翻新，给盗窃罪的研究带来了新课题，也给盗窃罪的审判提出了新要求。2011 年《中华人民共和国刑法修正案（八）》（以下简称：《刑法修正案（八）》）的颁布，2013 年《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理盗窃刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（以下简称《2013 盗窃解释》）的发布，对盗窃犯罪作了比之前更全面的规定，但还不够细化，在司法实践中仍会遇到一些疑惑。本文通过对盗窃犯罪若干争议问题进行研究，以期对司法实践能有所借鉴。本文分为三章：

　　第一章针对盗窃罪目的进行研究。该部分分为两个内容，一个是盗窃目的问题，一个是使用盗窃问题。在第一部分中，文章首先介绍了有关盗窃目的内涵的主要学说。其次介绍了盗窃目的的演变及争论。针对必要说与不要说的争论，笔者倾向于认同必要说，因为不要说的理论基础尚不符合我国的刑事法律政策及理论依据。但就必要说而言，笔者认为其内容也仅限于永久占有他人财物的意思，至于是否是“排除+利用”,还是“排除+建立占有”,笔者认为没有必要加入这么多的限定。在第二部分中，主要论述使用盗窃，对使用盗窃能否入罪，以及使用盗窃的分类展开研究。

　　第二章研究几类盗窃犯罪的对象。文章首先探讨的是盗窃数额。在数额一节中，通过对数额较大入罪合理化思考，说明了数额较大设置的必要性及设立方式的合理性。针对盗窃数额的具体认定，笔者谈了自己的看法。其次论述虚拟财产能否成为盗窃罪的犯罪对象。作者提出就目前网络游戏的发展水平、对虚拟财产的权属认定及技术鉴定水平的状况下，完全将虚拟财产纳入《中华人民共和国刑法》（以下简称《刑法》）保护范围还不够成熟，能否成为盗窃犯罪的对象，仍需进行研究。然后文章对不动产能成为盗窃犯罪的对象给与了充分的论证。最后，笔者对无形财产中的互联网带宽和流量的性质进行了分析，从而得出盗窃罪中应对窃取他人网络带宽和流量的行为进行规制。通过虚增消费积分的实例分析，不难看出消费积分也是盗窃罪的犯罪对象之一。

　　第三章研究盗窃犯罪的行为。在认定多次盗窃中，针对现在认定多次盗窃标准不统一，笔者认为只要在空间性、时间性、对象性等形式上加以考虑即可。多次盗窃不应在犯罪预备、未遂、中止的情况下区别予以对待。而且，多次盗窃中的每次盗窃，必须未达到数额较大或具有入户盗窃、扒窃、携带凶器盗窃的情形。

　　在认定入户盗窃中，首先对户的定义进行论述，其次对入户的主观目的进行论述，最后对入户的行为方式分开展开论述。在扒窃中，文章对扒窃的对象和扒窃的行为、场合分别进行分析，提出贴身说。在携带凶器盗窃中，对凶器的定义作了阐述，然后对什么是携带行为提出了自己的看法。

　　[关键词] 盗窃 盗窃对象 盗窃行为

　　Abstract of Thesis for Master of Law

　　Larceny, a common crime against property, has received more attention during along period in criminal theoretical fields. Due to the high frequency, extensivecriminal objects and diversified means of larceny, there are many disputes both intheory and judicial practice. Along with the ratification of the eighth amendment tothe Criminal Law, those acts of larceny are further defined. The conviction of larcenyis not detailed according to the present law. This article has a thorough research onsome disputed issues in subjective and objective components of the larceny byconsulting the predecessor research results. This article aims to elaborate thetheoretical works of larceny and its legislation of our country from the point view ofjudicial practice and theories as well. The thesis is composed of three parts:

　　In the first part, the author analyses the purpose of larceny. This section isdivided into two parts. In the first part, the article first introduces the connotation ofthe major doctrines of theft purposes. Secondly the article describes the evolution ofthe purpose of larceny and controversy. As to “Need to say” and “do not say” forargument, the author intend to agree necessary to say, because the theoretical basis ofthe criminal law is not yet in line with our policy and theory. But the author believesthat its content is limited to the permanent possession of the property of others mean,the author believes that there is no need to join so many limited. The second part willbe discussed with larceny of use. The use of larceny can be fined or not.

　　The second part discusses several special objects of larceny crimes. The articlefirst explores the amount.The author explains the necessity of setting up a largeamount of rationality way, the amount of specifically identified for larceny, the authortalked about his own views. Secondly, whether fictitious property can become theobject of crime were discussed, considers that the current level of development ofonline games, fictitious property ownership for our determination and identification ofthe level of technology, it is not able to be fully integrated into the virtual propertyprotection scope of criminal law, whether it can become the object of theft crimeremains to be investigated. Finally, the intangible property in the nature of Internetbroadband and network flow are analyzed in order to show that the larceny ofbroadband and network flow should be regulated . It is easy to see the consumer creditis one of the objects of larceny crimes through examples of consumer credit inflated.

　　The third chapter studies of behavior of the objective aspects of the crime of theft.

　　In that the repeated theft, for now that the repeated theft of the standard is not unified,the author believes that as long as the space, time, object, form can be considered. Therepeated theft should not difference to be treated in preparation for a crime, attempted,suspend the case. And the repeated theft does not require every time a crime. In aburglary, the first is to households that meaning, then suggested that had not been aburglary behavior will constitute the crime of theft. On going into the householdsbehavior separately discussed. In pickpocket, the object of theft and pickpocketingbehavior, situations were analyzed, put forward personal said. In lethal theft ofweapons, the definition is elaborated, then what is the carrying behavior put forwardtheir views.

　　[KEY WORDS] larceny object of larceny act of larceny.
 

　　目 录

　　导 言……1

　　第一章 盗窃罪的犯罪目的 ……2

　　第一节 盗窃罪的犯罪目的……2

　　一、盗窃目的内涵的主要学说……2

　　二、盗窃目的的演变及争论……4

　　三、盗窃罪“非法占有为目的”之辨析……6

　　第二节 使用盗窃……9

　　一、使用盗窃的理论之争……9

　　二、使用盗窃的应有之意……10

　　三、使用盗窃是否能入罪……11

　　四、可罚的使用盗窃与不可罚的使用盗窃……11

　　第二章 几种盗窃罪犯罪对象研究 ……14

　　第一节 数额……14

　　一、何谓盗窃数额……14

　　二、数额较大入罪合理化思考……15

　　三、盗窃数额的具体认定……17

　　第二节 虚拟财产……17

　　一、虚拟财产的概念及特征……18

　　二、虚拟财产是否能成为盗窃犯罪对象……19

　　第三节 不动产……24

　　一、不动产可否成为盗窃对象的理论之争……24

　　二、不动产可以成为盗窃罪对象的理论分析……25

　　第四节 无形财产……26

　　一、无形财产成为盗窃罪对象的合理性……26

　　二、一些特殊的无形财产……27

　　第三章 盗窃行为研究 ……30

　　第一节 多次盗窃……30

　　一、多次盗窃概要……30

　　二、关于多次的不同理解……30

　　三、多次应从形式上理解……31

　　四、多次是否要在预备、未遂、中止的情况下区别对待……32

　　五、多次是否要求每次都构成犯罪……33

　　第二节 入户盗窃……34

　　一、入户盗窃中对“户”的认定……35

　　二、有入户进行盗窃的行为是否就能认定为入户盗窃……36

　　三、入户盗窃是否要求行为人在入户前就有盗窃的故意……37

　　四、入户的行为方式……38

　　第三节 扒窃……39

　　一、扒窃对象--“财物”的应有之意……39

　　二、“随身携带”的应有之意……40

　　三、“公共场所”的应有之意……42

　　四、“扒窃”是行为犯还是结果犯……44

　　第四节 携带凶器盗窃……45

　　一、携带凶器盗窃入罪的必要性……45

　　二、什么是凶器……46

　　三、什么是携带……48

　　四、携带凶器盗窃未遂的认定……49

　　参考文献……51

　　后 记……56