【摘要】:传销活动中法律关系错综复杂,往往还伴随着非法拘禁罪、故意伤害罪、故意杀人罪等犯罪行为,这些犯罪行为与组织、领导传销罪之间的关系如何,是从一重罪处罚还是数罪并罚,一直是困扰司法机关的难题。笔者在前辈研究的基础。针对三起传销案引发的相关争议进行了研究。本文结合案例,重在分析组织领导传销活动行为与非法拘禁行为的关系问题,组织领导传销活动罪情节严重标准等,以求通过本文的思考能对理论及司法实践提供一点有益的参考。本文主要分三个部分:第一部分,介绍三个案例及引发的问题,郭强组织领导传销案,冯云、贾丽丽传销拘禁致人坠亡案,李兵等暴力传销致人死亡案;第二部分是相关问题的展幵,主要分析组织领导传销活动过程中实施非法拘禁行为的定性问题,组织领导传销过程中实施非法拘禁致人死亡的定性问题,组织领导传销过程中暴力拘禁致人死亡的定性问题,在每个争议焦点论述后提出了笔者对本案争议焦点的观点;第三部分,案例评析及完善立法的建议。通过前文的论证笔者认为组织领导传销活动过程中非法拘禁他人根据现有立法不构成组织领导传销活动罪的情节加重犯,而应认定为组织领导传销活动罪与非法拘禁罪的牵连犯,但鉴于牵连犯的处罚原则在理论和实践中均存在较大争议,本文认为应把非法拘禁行为直接规定在组织领导传销活动罪中作为其情节加重犯论处并根据实践中常发结果对情节严重作更细致且操作性强的规定,进一步完善组织领导传销活动罪的规定。针对组织领导传销过程中暴力拘禁行为致人死亡的情形本文认为应按数罪并罚处理。通过本文的思考期望能对司法实践提供一些有益的指导。
【关键词】:组织领导传销活动罪 非法拘禁行为 牵连犯 情节严重标准
Abstract:Pyramid sales activities crime involves complex legal relationships and is oftenassociated with the crime of illegal detention, intentional assault, intentional homicidecrimes and so on, what the relationship between these crimes and organizing andleading Pyramid sales activities crime , a felony punishment or multiple crimes, thejudiciary has been troubled by the problem. Based on predecessors studies, the authordiscussed controversies triggered by three prominent cases. In this paper according tothe cases focuses on the problem of the relationship between organization, leadershipbehavior and illegal detention, organization and plot severe standards of Pyramidsales activities crime , through this these thoughts of this article in order to provide alittle useful reference to theory and judicial practice. This paper consist three parts:
the first part, the introduction of three cases and problems caused by thecases,organization and leadership of Pyramid sales activities crime by Guo Qiang,Feng Yun and Jia Lili Pyramid sales activities crime detained student's falling deathcase, Li Bing violence in Pyramid sales activities crime caused Han's death; Thesecond part is the commencement of controversies above, mainly analysing the natureof illegal detention and death caused by illegal detention in the process oforganization and leadership of Pyramid sales activities,violence in detention in theprocess of organization and leadership of Pyramid sales activities causing death, theauthor put forward own ideas after the exposition of each of the focus of controversy;The third part,analysis on cases and the perfect legislative proposals. Through theabove discussion the author believe that illegal detention in the process oforganizational leadership Pyramid sales activities on the basis of the existinglegislation does not constitute aggravated plot of the organizational leadershipPyramid sales activities crime, but should be identified as the organizationalleadership pyramid sales activities crime and the crime of illegal detention ofimplicated offense. However in view of the principle of punishment of implicatedoffense is so controversial both in theory and practice, this paper holds that we shouldregard the behavior of illegal detention stipulated directly as the aggravated plot oforganizational leadership pyramid sales activities crime in legislation,and accordingto the practice often results we should regulate the aggravated plot more detail andoperational to further improve the requirements of this crime, violence behaviorwhich caused deaths in the process of organizational leadership pyramid sales activities should be handled by multiple crimes. Through this thinking the author is expected to provide some useful guidance for judicial practice.
Key words: Organization and Leadership of Pyramid Sales Activities Crime IllegalDetention Implicated Offender Serious Plot Standard
序言
传销始于美国,流行于世界各国,进入我国后被不法分子利用成为谋取暴利的“经济邪教”,给社会,家庭及个人都造成了极其恶劣的影响,组织领导传销活动罪就是在传销组织疯狂扩散的情况下被列入刑法。目前,我国传销活动主要分北派传销和南派传销两大类,北派传销以吃大锅饭,睡地铺,条件艰苦为特征,以年轻人为主,尤其是近年来大量大学生加入;南派传销以连锁销售的纯资本运作为主。本文主要探讨的是北派传销中的非法拘禁问题,这类传销主要是靠非法拘禁手段引诱,胁迫他人加入传销组织,实践中较普遍,而对于传销活动中非法拘禁问题的评价在理论和实践中仍存在不少争议。《刑法修正案(七)》中组织领导传销活动罪对组织领导传销活动过程中非法拘禁致人死亡的定罪及处罚规定并不明确,而且情节严重也没有具体标准,实践中各地司法审判多不一致,这有违于刑法的罪刑法定原则的明确性精神,也会造成罚不当罚或不尽其罚,罪责刑不一致的情况,判决的不一致易引起社会的不稳定因素,影响社会和谐。本文针对《刑法修正案(七)》中“组织、领导传销活动罪”立法中对组织领导传销过程中非法拘禁致人死亡定罪及处罚不明确问题及完善措施进行了分析,以期增强刑法打击传销的震慑力以及对司法实践有更明确的指导作用。
返回本篇论文目录查看全文 下一章:相关案例及引发的争议问题