文学理论论文

您当前的位置:学术堂 > 文学论文 > 文学理论论文 >

卢卡奇文论对胡风的影响探究

来源:学术堂 作者:陈老师
发布于:2016-10-19 共3518字
  本篇论文快速导航:

展开更多

  目录
  
  中文摘要
  
  Abstract
  
  绪论
  
  一 卢卡奇总体性思想对胡风的影响
  
  (一)卢卡奇总体性思想下的伟大的现实主义文论
  
  (二)卢卡奇“内容与形式的统一”对胡风的影响
  
  (三)卢卡奇典型观对胡风典型观的影响
  
  二 卢卡奇艺术真实观对胡风的影响
  
  (一)卢卡奇艺术真实观的美学标准
  
  (二)卢卡奇“两个反对”对胡风的影响
  
  三 卢卡奇人道主义文论观对胡风的影响
  
  (一)卢卡奇人道主义文论观
  
  (二)卢卡奇“主体性意识”对胡风的影响
  
  (三)卢卡奇“克服物化观”对胡风的影响
  
  结语
  
  参考书目
  
  致谢


  中文摘要
  
  乔治·卢卡奇是匈牙利着名的哲学家、美学家、文学史家和文艺批评家,对马克思主义文论的蓬勃发展和广泛传播起到了重大作用,他被誉为西方马克思主义文论的“鼻祖”.卢卡奇文论在传播到中国的过程中,左翼文学家胡风做出了重大贡献。卢卡奇文艺理论对胡风的影响已经被越来越多的学者所认同,但目前对两者的研究大多处于平行对比的视角之中,缺乏对两者影响关系的细致系统地论述。因而,本文有很大的可挖掘的学术研究空间和潜力。
  
  本文包括以下五大部分:
  
  第一部分 绪论首先介绍了卢卡奇在中国传播的大体历程及胡风在其中所贡献的主要力量;其次梳理了卢卡奇研究、胡风研究及卢卡奇对胡风影响研究的主要研究现状、学术成果及不足,进而明确了本篇论文对卢卡奇对胡风影响进行研究有着重要价值和意义,既可以充分探讨卢卡奇文学理论传播到中国的语境变化,又可以对胡风文论的源头进行深入挖掘,从而彰显现实主义文论在当代中国文坛上的生命力。
  
  第二部分 此部分论述了卢卡奇总体性思想对胡风的影响。第一小节中概括总结了卢卡奇总体性文论的主要理论观点--现实主义文学需要对社会现实进行完整整体的反映,进而指出卢卡奇在形式与内容、典型性两个文论主张中对胡风的影响;第二小节以胡风明确援引卢卡奇《叙述与描写》片段进行民族形式论争为主要依据,从内容因素、形式因素与内容与形式统一因素三个方面来细致论述影响内容;第三小节在前人对典型问题的研究基础之上,进一步梳理了卢卡奇在对普遍的特殊化、对日常生活的超越性以及对世界反映的交织感三个方面对胡风的影响。
  
  第三部分 此部分阐述了卢卡奇艺术真实观对胡风的影响。第一小节介绍了卢卡奇艺术真实观的必然律与可然律统一、普遍性与具体性统一的美学标准,以及基于这两种标准之上的现实主义文论所达到的历史精神与未来倾向;第二小节中,以胡风公开称赞的卢卡奇《叙述与描写》中的理论为蓝本,细致分析了卢卡奇反对自然主义与现代主义的主体思路对胡风批评客观主义与主观公式主义的影响,并进一步明确卢卡奇与胡风对待这两种文学时傲立的战斗姿态。
  
  第四部分 此部分讨论了卢卡奇人道主义文论观对胡风的影响。本部分中的第一小节展现了卢卡奇人道主义文论观的内涵,即文学作品诗意的源头应当是人同自身、人同社会和环境以及人同人的关系这三个维度;第二小节中,以胡风公开支持卢卡奇的“世界观与创作方法”为理论起点,论述了卢卡奇在“主客体统一”这一角度对胡风的影响;第三小节中,首先从历时性的角度证明胡风是一个“福本主义”者,从而说明胡风间接受到卢卡奇异化文学观的影响。
  
  第五部分 结语当中总结了卢卡奇与胡风两人的营养与反哺的双重关系,指出正是这样的学术继承、交流与发展促进了当代文论的蓬勃发展。以卢卡奇与胡风所坚守的现实主义文论传统与人道主义精神为视角,透视当代我国文论漠视现实与人性的现状,认为现实主义传统需要重新得到重视并予以回归。
  
  关键词:卢卡奇;胡风;总体性;艺术真实;人道主义
  
  Abstract
  
  Ceorg Lukacs is a Hungary's famous philosopher, esthetician, literary historian andliterary critics who plays a key role in the development and dissemination of Marxistliterary theory. He is known as the western marxist literary theory .In the process oflukacs theories spread to China,Left-wing writers hufeng made a significantcontribution. Ceorg Lukacs's influence on Hu Feng's literary theory has beenapproved by more and more scholars. But up to now, studies of the two is mainly inparallel contrastive perspective, lacking of detailed and systematical analysis aboutthe relation between them. Therefore, this thesis has a great space and potential foracademic research.
  
  This paper includes the following five parts:
  
  Part One: First, the introduction introduces the dissemination of Lukacs' conceptsin China and Hu Feng's main contribution in this aspect. Then, it presents Lukacs'research, Hu Feng's research, main research status of Lukacs' influence on Hu Feng,academic achievement and the deficiency. Last, it comes up the value andsignificance of the research about Lukacs' influence on Hu Feng explicitly.It can fullyexplore lukacs's spread in the context of Chinese literary theory, and to dig deeplyinto the origin of Hu feng's literary theory, so as to reveal the vitality of realisticliterary theory in contemporary Chinese literary world.
  
  Part Two: This part discusses the influence of Lukacs' ideology of totality on HuFeng. The first chapter summarizes principal theoretical viewpoints about Lukacs'literary theory of totality--realism literature need to complete the overall reflectionof social reality,and then indicates Lukacs' influence on Hu Feng in form, content andtypicalness. The second chapter takes the basis that Hu Feng quotes some segments ofLukacs' Narration and Description to debate national form to discuss the influencefrom angles of content, from and unification of content and form. The third chapterwhich is based on the predecessors' study of typical problems discusses furtherLukacs' influence on Hu Feng from three aspects of particularizing of the universal,transcendence of daily life and mixed feeling of reflection of world.
  
  Part Three: This part expounds the influence of Lukacs' artistic real view to HuFeng. The first chapter presents the aesthetic standard of unification of necessity andcontingency of Lukacs' artistic real view and the historical spirit and future tendencyachieving by the realistic literary theory which is based on this kind of standard. Thesecond chapter takes Hu Feng's public praise about Lukacs' Narration andDescription as blueprint to analyze the influence of Lukacs' main ideas of opposing ofnaturalism and modernism to Hu Feng's critical objectivism and subjectiveformularism. Then, it analyzes their attitudes to these two kinds of literature.
  
  Part Four: This part discusses the influence of Lukacs' literary theory ofhumanitarianism to Hu Feng. The first chapter of this part presents the meaning ofLukacs' literary theory of humanitarianism which holds the idea that poetic source ofliterature should be human being and themselves, the relation between human beingand society as well as the relation of human being. The second chapter takes HuFeng's public support of Lukacs' “world view and creation method” as theorybeginning to discuss Lukacs' influence to Hu Feng in the angle of “unity of subjectand object”. The third chapter proves that Hu Feng supports “bukumotoism” fromdiachronic perspective. Then it wants to show Hu Feng is influenced by Lukacs'exotic literary theory indirectly.
  
  Part Five: The conclusion summarizes the double relations of supporting andre-feeding between Lukacs and Hu Feng, and points out that such kind of academicinheritance, exchange and development pushes the vigorous development ofcontemporary literary theory. This thesis takes Lukacs and Hu Feng's realistic literarytheory and humanitarian spirit as perspectives to show the ignorance of literary theoryand situation of humanity of our contemporary era and come up with an idea that therealism tradition is supposed to be paid more attention and accepted again.
  
  Keywords: Lukacs; Hu Feng; Ideology of totality; Artistic real view; Literary theoryof humanitarianism
返回本篇论文导航
相关内容推荐
相关标签:
返回:文学理论论文