自然辩证法论文

您当前的位置:学术堂 > 哲学论文 > 自然辩证法论文 >

维贝克技术道德化理论的批判(4)

来源:东北大学学报(社会科学版) 作者:刘铮
发布于:2017-06-20 共9755字
  然而,倘若我们换一个问法,不再问“技术物有道德吗”而是问“技术有道德吗”,或许有利于我们走出“经验转向”以来技术哲学的内在困境。也就是说,我们需要回到“技术”(τε’χνη)的源始意义上去考察,在亚里士多德的意义上界定技术是一种以善为目的的理智德性,在海德格尔的意义上界定技术是真理的发生方式,从而有助于揭示技术与伦理之间的本质同源性,技术与伦理因而并不是相互外在的两个东西。这或许就成为一种超越于“经验转向”以来技术哲学之内在困境的可能理论路径。
  
  参考文献:
  
  [1]Ihde D.Peter-Paul Verbeek and a PostphenomenologicalMirror[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:292-296.  
  [2]Verbeek P.Moralizing Technology:Understanding andDesigning the Morality of Things[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,2011.  
  [3]Verbeek P.Expanding Mediation Theory[J].Found Sci.,2012,17:391-395.  
  [4]Latour B.We Have Never Been Modern[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1993:9.  
  [5]Verbeek P.Materializing Morality:Design Ethics andTechnological Mediation[J].Science Technology &Human Values,2006,31:361-380.  
  [6]Kroes P,Verbeek P.Introduction:The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts[C]∥ The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014.  
  [7]Verbeek P.Some Misunderstandings About the MoralSignificance of Technology[C]∥ The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:75-88.  
  [8]Peterson M,Spahn A.Can Technological Artefacts BeMoral Agents?[J].Science Engineering Ethics,2011,17:411-424.  
  [9]Illies C,Meijers A.Artefacts Without Agency[J].TheMonist,2009,92(3):420-440.  
  [10]Peterson M.Three Objections to Verbeek[J].Philos.Technol.,2014,27:301-308.  
  [11]Van de Poel I.Technology as Moral Agent[J].Philos.Technol.,2012,25:615-619.  
  [12]Brey P.From Moral Agents to Moral Factors:TheStructural Ethics Approach[C]∥The Moral Status ofTechnical Artefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:125-142.  
  [13]Pitt J.“Guns Dont Kill,People Kill”:Values in and/orAround Technologies[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:89-102.  
  [14]Mitcham C.Agency in Humans and in Artifacts:AContested Discourse[C]∥The Moral Status of TechnicalArtefacts.Dordrecht:Springer Press,2014:11-30.  
  [15]Smith D.Rewriting the Constitution:A Critique of“Postphenomenology”[J].Philos.Technol.,2015,28:533-551.
作者单位:
原文出处:刘铮. 技术物是道德行动者吗?——维贝克“技术道德化”思想及其内在困境[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(03):221-226.
相关内容推荐
相关标签:
返回:自然辩证法论文