结语
实践证明，大学和中小学伙伴关系的建立可以使大学教师的理论得到实践的支持，进而提高理论的深度，也可以弥补中小学教育缺少系统理论的缺陷，全面推动教育实践的开展；解决了教师分布不均素质良莠不齐的问题，大大的提高了整体教育水平。当前大学和中小学通过建立伙伴关系来提高创新能力和教育水平是大势所趋，是历史发展的必然。
随着社会的进步，我国的大学和中小学的伙伴关系一定会更加融洽，更加合理，我国的教育事业一定会更加强大。虽然伙伴关系的平台基础有所提高，但是我们不应自满自足反而更应该好好审视自己，大多数大学和中小学的合作没有达到预想的要求，还没有发挥他们最大程度的推动作用，对我国教育的发展起到的作用微乎其微。我国还处在探索大学和中小学伙伴关系的初级价段，不能盲目的照搬照抄国外的大学和中小学伙伴关系的模式，应该根据具体情况具体分析。由于个人能力和资料的局限性，本文在某些方面还存在着很多不足，在今后的日子里这些不足是本研究努力的方向，我会不断地将其完善。
参考文献：
一、国外文献：
[1] Shive, J.Collaboration between K-12 Schools and Universities. In Hoffman, Reed. & Rosenbluth, ed. StateUniversity of New York Press.1997.
[2] Beaumont, J. J. Administrator and researcher: Conflicting dual roles in directing a school-universitypartnership. Urban Education. 1998.
[3] Darling- Hammond. L. Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing a Profession [M]. NewYork: Teachers College Press.1994.
[4] Burbank, M, Kauchak, D. An alternative model for professional development: investigations into effectivecollaboration [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education.2003.
[5] John A R. Professional Development Schools: Prospects for Institutionalization [J]. Journal of TeacherEducation, 1995, Vol. ll, N0. 2.
[6] Elisabeth Hess Rice. The Collaboration Process in Professional Development Schools [J]. Journal ofTeacher Education. 2002.
[7] Levin, Barbara B & Rock, T. The effects of collaborative action research on preserves and in serviceteacher partner in professional development school [J].Journal of Teacher Education, 2003.
[8] Betty C E pan chin, Karen Carlucci. The Professional Development School without Walls. A Partnershipbetween a University and Two Districts [J]. Remedial and Special Education, 2002（6）。
[9] NCATE. Standards for Professional Development Schools [EB/OL].
[10] The National Commission on Teaching &America's Future. What Matters Most: Teacher ForAmerica'sFuture [EB/OL].http//www.nctaf.org,1996.
[11] Holmes Group. Tomorrow's schools of Education [R]. East. Lansing. Michigan: Author.1995.
[12] Elmore, R. F. Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political scienceQuarterly. 1980.
[13] Goodlad, J. I. School-university Partnerships and Partner Schools. In Hugh G. Petrie（Ed.）。Professionalization, Partnership and Power: Building Professional Development Schools. StateUniversity of New York Press.1995.
[14] Sirotnik. School-university Partnerships in Action. New York: Teachers College Press. 1998.
[15] Holmes Group. Tomorrow's Teachers [M]. East Lansing, 1996.
[16] David F. Labaree Power. Knowledge and the Rationalization of the Movement to ProfessionalizeTeaching. Harvard and Educational Review. 1992. Vol 62.
[17] James Comer &Valerie Maholmes. 'Creating School of Child Development and Education in the USA:Teacher Preparation for Urban Schools', Journal of Education for Teaching. 1999,Vol. 25.No. 1.
[18] Whitford, B.L. &Kyle, D. W. Interdisciplinary Teaming as Staff Development: Initiating Change in aMiddle School. In W. T. Pink & A. A. Hyde （Eds.）， Effective staff development for school change.Norwood, NJ: Ablex,1992.
[19] Whitford, B.L. &Kyle, D. W. Interdisciplinary teaming as staff development: Initiating change in a middleSchool. In W. T. Pink & A. A. Hyde（Eds.）， Effective staff development for school change. Norwood, NJ:Ablex,1992.
[20] Wells Junior High School. Mission Statement, 1989:3.
[21] Burbank, M, Kauchak, D. An alternative model for professional development: investigations intoeffective collaboration [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education.2003.
[22] Berry & Catoe. Creating Professional Development Schools: Policy and Practice in South Carolina'sInitivatives [M]. New York. Teachers College Press.1994.
[23] Sirotnik. School-University Partnerships in Action. New York: Teachers College Press. 1988:14, 191-204.
[24]Professional Development School Sample Partner Agreement PA-001-009 [EB/OL].
