摘要
法制是法治国家的永恒话题。随着中国改革开放的步伐加快,物质文明迅速发展,政治文明也应配套而上,司法审判体制在实践中形成的法官错案责任追究问题就凸显起来,我国的法官错案责任追究机制的缺失和完善关系到国家司法审判体制体系是否健全;同时法官制度是实现社会公正的最后一道屏障。
法官制度是否完善关系到社会公正能否实现,社会公正秩序也随之建立,相反,如果法官制度不完善那么社会公平正义就很难有所保障,会导致社会诸多的不公正产生。因此,作为法官监督的法官错案责任追究制度就显得更为重要。
法官依据法律享有独立审判不受任何机关干预的权利。但所谓“审判独立”并非“审判孤立”,更非“审判独裁”。基于权力制约的原理,法官自应有适当的监督机制,以免法官违法失职或有不当言行影响其公正形象和独立行使职权。因此,法官错案追究责任制就是这种监督机制之一。
在我国古代的法制文明中早已有了成熟地司法官吏错案责任追究体制,中华法系的核心《唐律疏议》中就明确规定了司法官吏的违法失职行为应当承担“出入人罪"的具体适用情形。我国现今的错案追究制度源于特定的历史条件,跟随着时代的发展,其不合理的责任认定标准以及制度设计引发的一系列现实弊端日渐凸显,错案追究制度作为我国法官惩戒制度的主要内容,法律依据就目前而言仅限各地方及各法院内部的规定。显而易见,这项制度虽然到目前为止适用的时间很长,范围也很广,但却仍未形成统一的规范。导致了我国对法官错案责任追究始终处于混乱不堪地状态,没有确切的追究原则去遵循,责任承担方式也畸重畸轻,从另一方面也加剧了冤假错案的出现。
相比之下,英、美、德、日等西方发达国家,针对法官失职行为均采用法官弹劾与法官惩戒两阶段的处理模式,并且,惩戒措施也比较灵活多样。这一处理模式能够较好的起到实质意义上的法官惩戒的作用。由于法制环境及发展的特殊性,我国现行的法官责任追究制度是一种追究与处罚捆绑的混合模式,从整体运作而言更倾向于西方国家的法官惩戒制度。比较之下,暴露了我国错案责任追究制度中的很多问题,错案责任追究体制在程序上应当从错案受理、错案审查、审核抄送、责任追究四个方面入手,充分利用我国权力结构中的独特性,发挥人大常委会的监督职能,以权力制约权力,在保障法官独立审判的同时,有效监督法律适用及审判程序,减少冤假错案的产生。在未来的错案追究体制地改进中应当借鉴我国古代的优秀经验,吸取西方法官弹劾惩戒两阶段模式的合理性,结合本国的国情,创制一套符合我国法制环境的法官错案责任追究制度。
关键词:法官错案追究机制司法公正
Abstract
The rule of law is the eternal topic in the country under the rule of law. With theacceleration of China's reform and opening up,rapid development of materialcivilization, political civilization should also form a complete set,the judicial systemin practice of the judge wrong case responsibility problem was highlighted, and thejudge in our country the lack of misjudged cases responsibility mechanism andperfect the system of the relationship to the national judicial system is sound; At thesame time,the judge system is the last barrier to realize social justice. Judge whetherthe system to perfect the related to the realization of social justice, social justice andorder is established, on the contrary, if the judge system is imperfect social equity andjustice is hard to guarantee, will lead to many social injustice.
Judges according to law shall have the right to independent trial is not affectedby any authority intervention. But the so-called "trial independence" is not isolated"trial", more than "dictatorship" trial. Based on the principle of power restriction,thejudge should have the appropriate monitoring mechanisms, so as to avoid the judgeillegal dereliction of duty or improper words and actions affect the justice image andindependently exercise their functions and powers. As a result,the judge misjudgedcases shall be investigated for responsibility system is one of the supervisionmechanism.
In the ancient civilization of the legal system in our country has already beenmature judicial officials misjudgments accountability system, the core of "Chineselegal system of Tang Dynasty" in specific provision of judicial officers of illegal actsshall bear the M Offense of imposing lighter or heavier sentences than necessary M.
Therefore, as justice supervision misjudged cases accountability system becomesmore important. Of misjudged cases investigated system in China is the result ofspecific historical conditions,along with the development of The Times, itsunreasonable responsibility cognizance standard and system design a series ofpractical disadvantages highlighted increasingly, misjudged cases investigated systemas the main content of the judge disciplinary system in China, the legal basis for themoment, only the regional and regulations inside the court. Although it is obvious thatthis system so far for a long time,range is very wide, but still did not form a unifiedspecification. Led to the wrong case to the judge in our country the responsibility isalways in a chaotic state,no principle to follow, the exact investigated also now toomuch now too little responsibility way, on the other hand, also aggravate the wrongs.
In contrast, the western developed countries, the United States,Germany, Britainand Japan, according to the judge and dereliction of duty by judge impeachment andjudge disciplinary treatment pattern, the two stage and is also more flexible,disciplinary measures. This model can better play a real sense of the judgedisciplinary action. Due to the special nature of the legal environment anddevelopment, China,s current judge responsibility system is a mixed mode of bindingwith punishment, punishment system from the overall operation is more inclined tothe west of judges. In contrast,exposed a lot of problems in our country in the systemof investigating the responsibility of misjudged cases, misjudgments accountabilitysystem should be from the misjudged case acceptance, misjudged case review,audit,accountability to the four aspects in the process, make use of the characteristic of ourcountry in the power structure, bringing supervision of people standing, restrictingpower with power at the same time,in ensuring the judge's independent trial, theeffective supervision of the legal application and judicial procedure, reduce theproduction of miscarriages of justice. In the future the misjudged case investigationsystem improvement should learn from the excellent experience in ancient China,absorb the rationality of western judicial impeachment two stage model, combiningthe national condition,create a set to conform to the environment of legal system ofthe liability of misjudged cases.
Keywords: judge; miss judged cases; Responsibility system; esponsibility ;Judicial justice
目录
摘要
Abstract
引言
一、我国法官错案责任追究制度现状
(一)我国法官错案责任追究制度的由来及其内容
(二)现行法官错案责任追究体制存在的问题
二、建立错案责任追究制度应遵循的原则
(一)错案概念界定公正化原则
(二)慎重追究责任原则
(三)责任主体具体化原则
(四)"裁判员"与“运动员"相分离原则
三、错案责任承担方式
(一)纪律责任
(二)暂停或取消法官资格
(三)法律责任
四、错案责任追究的实施程序
(一)疑似错案受理
(二)疑似错案审查
(三)审核抄送
(四)责任追究
结语
参考文献
致谢
中文摘要到案措施是公安机关现场处置时的有力武器,也是案件办理顺利进行的保障。由于法律规定的不明确、不合理,到案措施适用过程中存在不少问题。一方面到案措施不能适应警察现场处置及办案的需要;另一方面到案措施使用过程中致使公民自由、权利、财产被...
摘要未成年人案卷封存制度在2012年正式写入了《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》当中,未成年人犯罪记录封存制度是指对被宣告有罪的未成年人在被宣告有罪后,有关机关依据法律的规定,将未成年人预制相关的犯罪记录及案件的判决情况等相关信息由加以封存。同...
引言新修改的《刑事诉讼法》和《民事诉讼法》先后赋予了电子证据以独立的法律证据地位。作为新兴的证据类型,在信息化的大趋势下,电子证据的应用将越来越广、越来越深入。电子证据取证位于举证、质证、认证之前,对电子证据的证明力有着很大的影响,决定着...
结语刑事错案屡次出现在公众视野,引起了我国中央政法机关和司法机关的广泛重视。中央政法委制定了《关于切实防止冤假错案的规定》、最高人民法院制定了《关于建立健全防范刑事冤假错案工作机制的意见》,这些文件体现出,我国司法系统愈来愈关注刑事错案的...
摘要在时下的中国,对刑事诉讼被害人权利保护方面,还存在许多不足和不完善的地方。这既体现在现有法律规定上,也体现在司法实务和立法、执法人员的观念中。比如在参与庭审方面,被害人没有最后陈述权,也没有明确规定被害人是否参加庭审;在起诉权方面,...
第一章典型刑事错案的呈现及思考1.1系列刑事错案的呈现1.1.1杜培武案杜培武原是云南昆明戒毒所的一名普通民警。1998年4月22日,杜的妻子昆明市公安局民警王晓湘与杜的同学昆明市路南县(现为石林县)公安局副局长王俊波被发现死在同一辆微型面包车内。两...
中文摘要。刑事拘留制度,是我国刑事司法程序中一项重要的审前羁押制度,在打击犯罪、维护社会稳定等方面发挥了重要的作用。但在我国刑事司法活动的实践中,刑事拘留制度也暴露出了诸多侵害犯罪嫌疑人人权的问题,本文所讨论的隐性超期刑事拘留就是其中比较...
【摘要】2013年1月1日起施行的《刑事诉讼法》对我国的强制措施部分进行了修改,而本次修改最为令人们关注的是在第72条规定了指定居所监视居住制度。在监视居住制度处于一个备而不用的境地,要求废除监视居住制度意愿强烈的背景下,指定居所监视居住...
摘要中国确立无罪推定原则主要背景为我国日益发展的法治建设需要。从历史角度审视刑事诉讼法,可知:刑事诉讼法立法意义在于追究犯罪分子的刑事责任。在刑事责任追究过程中,我国立法存在最突出的问题便是一味强调犯罪事实的真实性,而忽略了程序正当的重...
摘要我国刑事诉讼法和相关司法解释一直严禁以威胁、引诱、欺骗方法获取口供。2012年修改后的刑事诉讼法第50条规定:严禁刑讯逼供和以威胁、引诱、欺骗以及其他非法方法收集证据,明确将威胁、引诱、欺骗认定为非法方法.但第54条第1款规定:采用刑讯...